Sexta-feira, 7 de Março de 2014

Jaffa - a Palestinian ordeal inside Israel

I came accross this article today. It shows what is happening in Jaffa, a Palestinian enclave in the south of Tel Aviv, in what is today a district of this city -  and I will tell you that I was myself an eye witness to similar situations in Jaffa. So I can definitly say this is not an unique story, this is the daily life of Palestinians living in the south of Tel Aviv. Gentrification is another word and another world in old Palestinian cities inside Israel. A different dimension is given to gentrification in Jaffa, as it does not only mean social exclusion - it is also a political instrument which aims at the expulsion of Palestinians from their homes, and eventually from Israel. This daily sabotage of Palestinian lives, making their life as uncomfortable as possible in the hope they leave the country. This a process aiming at keeping the Jewish state, Jewish, and that goes on parallel to Israeli politics of building settlements in the Westbank. However it goes on mainly unnoticed by the foreign media, and is never mentioned in international negotiations about the future state of Palestine. The Palestinians that stayed in Israel are the big loosers in this process. They will continue being second class citizens in Israel and will never profit much from a future state of Palestine - if ever there is to be one! It never stops to amaze me, that Israeli Jews, who are descendants from those who along many centuries suffered injustices and were murdered in Europe and elsewhere are doing the same to Palestinians. One would have thought that the suffering of Jewish people living in the Diaspora would have given them empathy for others and stopped them from doing the same. However, the way it goes, it seems there were no lessons learned. 

 

Gentrification leaves one Jaffa family caged in their own home

Ismail Shawa never expected that a new luxury apartment building would have such an immediate and dramatic effect on his family’s life — that was until contractors sealed off the entrance to their home with a concrete wall, effectively trapping them inside.

By Yudit Ilany

Ismail Shawa standing in the window he is forced to climb through in order to exit and enter his Jaffa home. (Photo by Yudit Ilany)

Ismail Shawa standing in the window he is forced to climb through in order to exit and enter his Jaffa home. (Photo by Yudit Ilany)

To exit or enter his Jaffa home, Ismail Shawa, 62, has to remove the bars from his bedroom window and climb out and over the neighbor’s water pipes. He still has to cross a yard that doesn’t belong to him but for the time being, no has told him not to. The other option is to exit over another neighbor’s flimsy and crumbling asbestos roof.

When his wife, Itidal Shawa, 67, fell ill a week and a half ago, paramedics had to call in the fire brigade to extract her because there is no longer any other way out but to climb through the small window — or over the neighbor’s roof.

A judge from the Tel Aviv Magistrate’s Court described the arrangement as “not easy,” but asserted that the family “can still enter and exit their home.” Perhaps the judge wouldn’t mind entering his courtroom through a small, high-placed window.

And all of this because a contractor building a fancy new luxury apartment buildingnext door erected a concrete wall that blocks the entrance to the Shawas’ home.

The plot on which the fancy housing complex sits was bought from the Israel Land Authority some years ago. Perhaps no one paid attention to the fact that the only entrance to the Shawa family home is through the same plot. Or perhaps they did pay attention but simply didn’t care.

Rights of way are recognized by Israeli law, so the Shawas should have been safe. They should have been able to continue entering their home through the neighboring plot, the same way they have since they first moved into their home 37 years ago.

The Shawas are a regular Jaffa family, simple people. And fancy housing developers do what they want; they have connections, expensive lawyers and when necessary, employ private guard companies with less-than-perfect behavioral records, as the Shawas found out a few weeks ago.

The Shawa family’s story starts in 1977 when Ismail and Itidal got married, took out a bank loan and bought protected tenancy rights from Sa’ado Jabar, the owner of the building in which the Shawas’ ground-floor apartment is located. The Shawas’ only entrance has always been from the backside of the building and through the empty adjacent plot.

Seven children were born and over the years and the Shawas turned their backyard into a garden with orange, lemon and mandarin trees, a grape arbour and lots of flowers. The children had their own small “farm” for their pets: chickens, a dog and lots of birds. Over the years, the garden overflowed into to the empty plot next door, which prior to their gardening efforts had become a place where drug dealers and addicts hid their stashes, weapons and stolen goods. The municipality even encouraged the Shawas to use the plot, then owned by the Israel Land Authority.

Mr. Shawa worked as small-time businessman while Mrs. Shawa was at home educating the children. Two of the married children moved out. The other five, all adults now, still live at home.

In 2010 the neighboring plot was sold and one morning in 2012, the Shawas woke up to the sound of bulldozers destroying their lovely garden. Mr. Shawa called the police, who stood by and watched and wouldn’t allow him to take his property or save the garden furniture and bird cages. It was then that the Shawas learned of the building planned for next door.

Mr. Saado Jabar, the owner of the building, an elderly and well-respected man in Jaffa, spoke with the contractor who promised him the Shawas would be given right of way. “They made the agreement by shaking hands,” Sammy Jabar, the owner’s son says. “My father is of that generation where a man’s word and a handshake mean more than any paper.”

Nevertheless, Mr. Shawa went to court and appealed to the municipality. The municipality recognised Mr. Shawa’s right of way.

In spite of that, Mr. Shawa agreed to stop using the old entrance if another entrance was arranged for him and his family. This was not done, first and foremost, because it was almost impossible technically, but also because it would create another legal problem: somebody else owns the land on the other side of the building and there would be no guaranteed right of way there either.

Two weeks ago the Shawas came home to find their only entrance blocked off by a concrete wall being protected by nearly a dozen private guards. Unable to enter their home, the Shawas called the police and showed them a letter from the municipality’s building department clearly stating an entrance path to the Shawa family home must be left open. That didn’t help. The police stood by and did nothing.

Ismail Shawa's daughter speaks with police officers outside the family home (Photo by Yudit Ilany)

Ismail Shawa’s daughter speaks with police officers outside the family home (Photo by Yudit Ilany)

The Shawas immediately took the case to court and the duty judge decided not to issue a temporary injunction or demolition order. Thus, the Shawas spent their first night outside of their home, unable to enter it. The second day they brought equipment and climbed in, over the asbestos roof belonging to one of the neighbours on the other side. It was then that the fire department had to be called to extricate Mrs. Shawa.

When a court finally decided they should be given right of way, Mr. Shawa once again called the police in order to enforce their right of way. The police did not intervene. It turned out the developers had appealed.

Accepting the developers’ appeal, a second judge decided that the concrete wall blocking the Shawas’ entrance did not have to be demolished, ruling the Shawas “can still enter their home,” albeit in an “uneasy manner.”

Two weeks later, the Shawas still have to climb through their bedroom window to enter and exit their home because their other neighbor doesn’t want them to climb over her roof any longer. She’s rightfully afraid that its crumbling asbestos will crack or collapse.

The Shawas spoke to the developer of the new building next door. They say he couldn’t care less. Wealthy Tel Aviv developers building in Jaffa tend not to see the poor neighbors below their fancy luxury buildings.

The future tenants of the fancy apartments will one day soon live next door to people who have many reasons not to like them. People who have to climb through a window to enter their home. People who have no gas for cooking because they can no longer replace the empty gas canisters. And it seems that no one really cares. Welcome to gentrifying Jaffa, 2014.

Yudit Ilany is an activist in the Jaffa Popular Committee for Housing and Land Allocation Rights.

 

 

in 

 

publicado por Cristina Dangerfield-Vogt - Jornalista às 07:44
link do post | comentar | favorito
|

.mais sobre mim

.pesquisar

 

.Fevereiro 2016

Dom
Seg
Ter
Qua
Qui
Sex
Sab

1
2
3
4
5
6

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

28


.posts recentes

. A VIDA NUMA MALA - Cristi...

. A VIDA NUMA MALA de Crist...

. Dia do Holocausto em Isra...

. Nação Judaica e os "Justo...

. The General's Son by Miko...

. Sayed Kashua leaving Isra...

. Jaffa - a Palestinian ord...

. Would Sephardic Jews righ...

. Dia Internacional do Holo...

. Um Ano em Telavive - curr...

.arquivos

. Fevereiro 2016

. Abril 2015

. Janeiro 2015

. Julho 2014

. Março 2014

. Fevereiro 2014

. Janeiro 2014

. Novembro 2013

. Outubro 2013

. Agosto 2013

. Maio 2013

. Dezembro 2012

. Novembro 2012

. Outubro 2012

. Agosto 2012

. Maio 2012

. Fevereiro 2012

. Dezembro 2011

. Outubro 2011

. Julho 2011

. Maio 2011

. Abril 2011

. Fevereiro 2011

. Dezembro 2010

. Novembro 2010

. Outubro 2010

. Setembro 2010

. Maio 2010

. Março 2010

. Fevereiro 2010

. Janeiro 2010

. Dezembro 2009

. Novembro 2009

. Outubro 2009

. Setembro 2009

.tags

. todas as tags

.links

blogs SAPO

.subscrever feeds